Amarjeet Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 236/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),340(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010010732026

Filing Number

938/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

236/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 08-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

RAJGIR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),340(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amarjeet Kumar

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court rejected the bail application of Amrajit Kumar, who was arrested on 08-02-2026 under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), and 3(5) for impersonating another candidate (Chanchal Kumar) during a CTET examination on 07-02-2026 by taking Rs. 25,000. The court found the charges serious and determined that granting bail was inappropriate given the grave nature of the offense and the applicant's involvement in examination fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 236/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of Amrajit Kumar, who was arrested on 08-02-2026 under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), and 3(5) for impersonating another candidate (Chanchal Kumar) during a CTET examination on 07-02-2026 by taking Rs. 25,000. The court found the charges serious and determined that granting bail was inappropriate given the grave nature of the offense and the applicant's involvement in examination fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case