Ashish Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 362/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010010542026

Filing Number

925/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

362/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 08-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

877

Police Station

Official Complaint

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashish Kumar

    Adv. ASHISH VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ashish Kumar under IPC Sections 406 and 420, finding prima facie evidence against him for fraudulently issuing 37 fixed deposit receipts totaling ₹11,25,000 in the names of various individuals while serving as Post Master Grade-1 at Tajnichpur Post Office, without proper authorization or passbooks. The court determined that the serious nature of the charges and the alleged criminal conduct make granting bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 362/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ashish Kumar under IPC Sections 406 and 420, finding prima facie evidence against him for fraudulently issuing 37 fixed deposit receipts totaling ₹11,25,000 in the names of various individuals while serving as Post Master Grade-1 at Tajnichpur Post Office, without proper authorization or passbooks. The court determined that the serious nature of the charges and the alleged criminal conduct make granting bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case