Md. Chhotu vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 212/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRNL010009502026
Filing Number
840/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
212/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
9
Police Station
SOHSARAI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Md. Chhotu
Adv. MD. ALI IMAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: 212/2026 - Md. Chhotu v. State of Bihar The court granted bail to petitioner Md. Chhotu, who was arrested on January 14, 2026, under sections 305 and 317(2) BNS for allegedly entering a house with intent to commit theft. The defense argued the charges lacked sufficient basis, no stolen property was recovered, and the petitioner had no criminal history and had been in judicial custody for approximately two months. The court found the investigation complete, charge sheet filed, and no prior convictions, and accordingly granted bail of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equivalent value, provided one surety is a close relative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 212/2026
Case Summary: 212/2026 - Md. Chhotu v. State of Bihar The court granted bail to petitioner Md. Chhotu, who was arrested on January 14, 2026, under sections 305 and 317(2) BNS for allegedly entering a house with intent to commit theft. The defense argued the charges lacked sufficient basis, no stolen property was recovered, and the petitioner had no criminal history and had been in judicial custody for approximately two months. The court found the investigation complete, charge sheet filed, and no prior convictions, and accordingly granted bail of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equivalent value, provided one surety is a close relative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts