Chunchun Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 310/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(2),140(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010008992026
Filing Number
799/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
310/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
ASTHAWAN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chunchun Kumar
Adv. PAL
-
2.Munchun Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Order
Case 310/2026 Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Chunchun Kumar and Munchun Kumar, who were accused of rash driving and attempting to evade police arrest under BNS sections 140(2), 140(3), and 3(5). The court found that the case diary contained no allegations beyond the incident of the petitioners driving away in a vehicle when asked to exit by police, and approved bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and two sureties, conditional on their physical presence at all hearings until charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 310/2026
Case 310/2026 Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Chunchun Kumar and Munchun Kumar, who were accused of rash driving and attempting to evade police arrest under BNS sections 140(2), 140(3), and 3(5). The court found that the case diary contained no allegations beyond the incident of the petitioners driving away in a vehicle when asked to exit by police, and approved bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and two sureties, conditional on their physical presence at all hearings until charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts