Ajit Yadav vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 300/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),109(1),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010008712026

Case disposed

Filing Number

775/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

300/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

83

Police Station

CHHABILAPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),109(1),352
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

Ajit Yadav

Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

12-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

HEARING

23-02-2026

HEARING

11-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: Ajit Yadav v. State of Bihar (Case 300/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Ajit Yadav, who was accused of firing at a person and his family over a land dispute on June 13, 2025, in Chhabilapur, Bihar. The defense argued the charges were baseless and that the allegations of specific assault or firing were not substantiated, while co-accused had already obtained bail from the High Court. The court found no specific evidence of firing or assault against the petitioner and noted no prior criminal history, observing the dispute was general in nature with no injuries caused. Accordingly, bail was granted with conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, with the petitioner required to surrender before the cognizance court within one month or face police custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ajit Yadav v. State of Bihar (Case 300/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Ajit Yadav, who was accused of firing at a person and his family over a land dispute on June 13, 2025, in Chhabilapur, Bihar. The defense argued the charges were baseless and that the allegations of specific assault or firing were not substantiated, while co-accused had already obtained bail from the High Court. The court found no specific evidence of firing or assault against the petitioner and noted no prior criminal history, observing the dispute was general in nature with no injuries caused. Accordingly, bail was granted with conditions including a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, with the petitioner required to surrender before the cognizance court within one month or face police custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Nalanda DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case