Chotani Kumar alias Kaju Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 294/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),333,74,76,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010008492026

Filing Number

757/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

294/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),333,74,76,3(5)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(i)(r),3(i)(s),3(i),w(i),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chotani Kumar alias Kaju Kumar

    Adv. GAURAV KUNAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Chhotani Kumar Urf Kaju Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 333, 74, 76, and the SC/ST Atrocities Act. The court found credible evidence of the accused's involvement in the alleged incident where the victim's house was entered and she was assaulted, determining that bail at this stage was inappropriate given the serious nature of the charges and the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-VI

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 294/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Chhotani Kumar Urf Kaju Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 333, 74, 76, and the SC/ST Atrocities Act. The court found credible evidence of the accused's involvement in the alleged incident where the victim's house was entered and she was assaulted, determining that bail at this stage was inappropriate given the serious nature of the charges and the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case