Sanjay Kumar Alias Niraj Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 195/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(2),305(a). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010008472026

Filing Number

755/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

195/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(2),305(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Kumar Alias Niraj Kumar

    Adv. Dilip Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nalanda rejected the bail petition of Sanjay Kumar, accused of theft under Sections 331(2) and 305(a) BNS. The court found that the petitioner is a habitual offender with nine similar criminal antecedents, made a confessional statement admitting guilt, and 34 items were recovered from his house, supported by witness testimonies and a charge sheet already filed against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 195/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nalanda rejected the bail petition of Sanjay Kumar, accused of theft under Sections 331(2) and 305(a) BNS. The court found that the petitioner is a habitual offender with nine similar criminal antecedents, made a confessional statement admitting guilt, and 34 items were recovered from his house, supported by witness testimonies and a charge sheet already filed against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case