Shrikant Alias Dablu vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 190/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,342,376,420. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010008192026

Filing Number

729/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

190/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,342,376,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shrikant Alias Dablu

    Adv. G.N. Shastri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The District Court of Nalanda, Bihar granted bail to accused Shrikant Urf Bundlu in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 376 (rape) and 420 (cheating). The court found that the complainant's allegations of sexual assault were contradicted by her own statement that she consensually married the accused on 29.06.2011, and that a prior FIR in the matter was closed due to lack of evidence. The court approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on the condition that the accused cooperate fully with the proceedings and appear before the court on every date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 190/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court of Nalanda, Bihar granted bail to accused Shrikant Urf Bundlu in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 376 (rape) and 420 (cheating). The court found that the complainant's allegations of sexual assault were contradicted by her own statement that she consensually married the accused on 29.06.2011, and that a prior FIR in the matter was closed due to lack of evidence. The court approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on the condition that the accused cooperate fully with the proceedings and appear before the court on every date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case