Md. Miraz Alias Ghocha vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 167/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(4),310(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRNL010007212026

Case disposed

Filing Number

649/2026

Filing Date

03-02-2026

Registration No

167/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(4),310(5)
Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26,35

Petitioner(s)

Md. Miraz Alias Ghocha

Adv. Ravish Kumar

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

06-03-2026

Disposed

26-02-2026

HEARING

24-02-2026

HEARING

13-02-2026

HEARING

05-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Order

The District and Additional Sessions Court in Nalanda, Bihar granted bail to the applicant Mo. Miraj Urfz Ghosh on March 6, 2026, in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 310(4), 310(5) and the Arms Act. The court found that the applicant, arrested on July 23, 2025, had been in judicial custody for approximately six months, and considering the case facts and circumstances, bail was granted on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equivalent value, noting that co-accused had previously received similar relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Additional Sessions Court in Nalanda, Bihar granted bail to the applicant Mo. Miraj Urfz Ghosh on March 6, 2026, in a case involving charges under BNS Sections 310(4), 310(5) and the Arms Act. The court found that the applicant, arrested on July 23, 2025, had been in judicial custody for approximately six months, and considering the case facts and circumstances, bail was granted on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equivalent value, noting that co-accused had previously received similar relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Nalanda DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case