Md. Nehal vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 261/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010007172026
Filing Number
645/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
261/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 08-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
255
Police Station
LAHERI PS
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Md. Nehal
Adv. KRISHNA KUMAR
-
2.Md. Manglu
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Order
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Md. Nehal and Md. Manglu in a burglary case (FIR U/s 457, 380 IPC), finding insufficient evidence against them—they were not named in the original FIR, no recovery was made from their possession despite the case being registered in 2017, and they had no criminal antecedents. The court directed them to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount, on condition they cooperate in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
05-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 261/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Md. Nehal and Md. Manglu in a burglary case (FIR U/s 457, 380 IPC), finding insufficient evidence against them—they were not named in the original FIR, no recovery was made from their possession despite the case being registered in 2017, and they had no criminal antecedents. The court directed them to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount, on condition they cooperate in investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts