Binod Yadav vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 149/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),127(2),118(2),109,351(2),190,61(2),191(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRNL010006472026
Filing Number
583/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
149/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Binod Yadav
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The District and Sessions Court in Nalanda, Bihar granted bail to accused Vinod Yadav in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 127(2), 109, 351(2), 190, 61(2), 191(2), and 352. The court found that while both parties sustained injuries in what it characterized as a "free-fight," the charges were general and non-specific, there was no prior criminal history, and the accused had been in judicial custody for approximately two months since arrest on December 25, 2025. Bail was granted at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equivalent value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
31-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 149/2026
The District and Sessions Court in Nalanda, Bihar granted bail to accused Vinod Yadav in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 127(2), 109, 351(2), 190, 61(2), 191(2), and 352. The court found that while both parties sustained injuries in what it characterized as a "free-fight," the charges were general and non-specific, there was no prior criminal history, and the accused had been in judicial custody for approximately two months since arrest on December 25, 2025. Bail was granted at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equivalent value. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts