Bittu Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 147/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRNL010006442026
Filing Number
580/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
147/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bittu Kumar
Adv. SRIKANT KUMAR
-
2.Praful Kumar
-
3.Deepak Kumar Alias Deepak Lal
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to three petitioners (Bittu Kumar, Praful Kumar, and Deepak Kumar) accused of armed robbery under BNS Section 309(6). The court found that the petitioners were not named in the FIR, no recovery was made from their possession, and they were implicated only on confessional statements of co-accused without specific evidence. Bail was allowed with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, considering their prolonged custody (over two months) and the compromised nature of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
31-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 147/2026
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to three petitioners (Bittu Kumar, Praful Kumar, and Deepak Kumar) accused of armed robbery under BNS Section 309(6). The court found that the petitioners were not named in the FIR, no recovery was made from their possession, and they were implicated only on confessional statements of co-accused without specific evidence. Bail was allowed with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, considering their prolonged custody (over two months) and the compromised nature of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts