Bittu Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 147/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRNL010006442026
Filing Number
580/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
147/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bittu Kumar
Adv. SRIKANT KUMAR
Praful Kumar
Deepak Kumar Alias Deepak Lal
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to three petitioners (Bittu Kumar, Praful Kumar, and Deepak Kumar) accused of armed robbery under BNS Section 309(6). The court found that the petitioners were not named in the FIR, no recovery was made from their possession, and they were implicated only on confessional statements of co-accused without specific evidence. Bail was allowed with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, considering their prolonged custody (over two months) and the compromised nature of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to three petitioners (Bittu Kumar, Praful Kumar, and Deepak Kumar) accused of armed robbery under BNS Section 309(6). The court found that the petitioners were not named in the FIR, no recovery was made from their possession, and they were implicated only on confessional statements of co-accused without specific evidence. Bail was allowed with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount each, considering their prolonged custody (over two months) and the compromised nature of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts