Anand Kumar alias Anandi Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 212/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(4),317(5),310(4),310(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010005902026
Filing Number
532/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
212/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
576
Police Station
HARNAUT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anand Kumar alias Anandi Kumar
Adv. SATYENDRA KRISHNAM
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 212/2026 Anand Kumar alias Anandi Kumar v. State of Bihar The court rejected the petitioner's bail application in this case involving charges under IPC sections 317(4), 317(5), 310(4), 310(5), and Arms Act sections 27(1-b), 26, and 35. The petitioner was arrested as part of an organized electricity wire theft gang operating across multiple Bihar districts. Police recovered illegal firearms, loaded country-made pistols, mobile phones, and auto parts from the accused and co-conspirators. The petitioner was identified as a key member planning major criminal activities. The court found sufficient evidence of serious offenses and denied bail, noting the petitioner's criminal propensity posed a flight risk and threat to public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 212/2026 Anand Kumar alias Anandi Kumar v. State of Bihar The court rejected the petitioner's bail application in this case involving charges under IPC sections 317(4), 317(5), 310(4), 310(5), and Arms Act sections 27(1-b), 26, and 35. The petitioner was arrested as part of an organized electricity wire theft gang operating across multiple Bihar districts. Police recovered illegal firearms, loaded country-made pistols, mobile phones, and auto parts from the accused and co-conspirators. The petitioner was identified as a key member planning major criminal activities. The court found sufficient evidence of serious offenses and denied bail, noting the petitioner's criminal propensity posed a flight risk and threat to public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts