Nagendra Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 114/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,115(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRNL010005292026
Filing Number
476/2026
Filing Date
24-Jan-2026
Registration No
114/2026
Registration Date
24-Jan-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
ASTHAWAN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nagendra Kumar
Adv. GYANENDRA KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: Nagendra Kumar v. State of Bihar (114/2026) The court granted bail to Nagendra Kumar, accused under IPC Sections 64, 115(2), and 351(2), finding insufficient evidence supporting the charges. The court noted critical deficiencies in the FIR including absence of specific date, time, and location of the alleged incident, and observed that the complainant's own statement contradicted key allegations, indicating consensual conduct between both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 114/2026
Case Summary: Nagendra Kumar v. State of Bihar (114/2026) The court granted bail to Nagendra Kumar, accused under IPC Sections 64, 115(2), and 351(2), finding insufficient evidence supporting the charges. The court noted critical deficiencies in the FIR including absence of specific date, time, and location of the alleged incident, and observed that the complainant's own statement contradicted key allegations, indicating consensual conduct between both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts