Shyam Yadav vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 178/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRNL010004792026

Case disposed

Filing Number

431/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

178/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

01

Police Station

BIND

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(2)

Petitioner(s)

Shyam Yadav

Adv. KRISHNA KUMAR

Shankar Yadav

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II

15-04-2026

Disposed

28-03-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

19-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: A.B.P. No. 178/2026 The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Shyam Yadav and Shankar Yadav, who were apprehending arrest in a case involving the alleged abduction of a 14-year-old girl by accused Monu Yadav. The petitioners, father and brother of the accused respectively, were alleged to have refused to return the girl when confronted. The court admitted them to anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000/- bail bonds each with two sureties, considering their lack of criminal antecedents and the weak nature of the direct allegation against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.B.P. No. 178/2026 The Court of Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Shyam Yadav and Shankar Yadav, who were apprehending arrest in a case involving the alleged abduction of a 14-year-old girl by accused Monu Yadav. The petitioners, father and brother of the accused respectively, were alleged to have refused to return the girl when confronted. The court admitted them to anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000/- bail bonds each with two sureties, considering their lack of criminal antecedents and the weak nature of the direct allegation against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Nalanda DJ Div. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case