Harkhit Yadav vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 171/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),127(2),118(2),109,351(2),190,61(2),191(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010004662026
Filing Number
419/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
171/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Harkhit Yadav
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR
-
2.Rupesh Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The District and Sessions Court of Nalanda, Bihar granted anticipatory bail to the accused (Harakhit Yadav and Rupesh Kumar) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 127(2), 109, 351(2), 190, 61(2), 191(2), and 352 relating to a violent altercation. The court found that while both parties sustained injuries in what appears to be a "free-fight" situation, no specific charges were leveled against the applicants, and the charges were general and multipurpose in nature. The court imposed bail conditions of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, permitting the accused to obtain interim relief until the case's conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 171/2026
The District and Sessions Court of Nalanda, Bihar granted anticipatory bail to the accused (Harakhit Yadav and Rupesh Kumar) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 127(2), 109, 351(2), 190, 61(2), 191(2), and 352 relating to a violent altercation. The court found that while both parties sustained injuries in what appears to be a "free-fight" situation, no specific charges were leveled against the applicants, and the charges were general and multipurpose in nature. The court imposed bail conditions of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, permitting the accused to obtain interim relief until the case's conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts