Sunny Kumar vs State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 17/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,191(3),126(2),115(2),74,109(1),333,324(2),352,103(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 15th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRNL010000602026
Filing Number
56/2026
Filing Date
05-01-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
05-01-2026
Court
Nalanda DJ Div.
Judge
3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
157
Police Station
SILAO
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunny Kumar
Adv. BARUN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 30-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Sunny Kumar's anticipatory bail application in a fatal assault case. The court found that the prosecution's allegations were grave and direct—Kumar allegedly struck the 60-year-old victim Anil Mistry on the head with a khanti during a water dispute, resulting in death, with charges upgraded to murder under Section 103(1) BNS. Despite Kumar's claims of false implication and his clean record, the court determined that the specific role attributed to him in the victim's statement, combined with medical evidence confirming the fatal head injury, rendered him ineligible for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Sunny Kumar's anticipatory bail application in a fatal assault case. The court found that the prosecution's allegations were grave and direct—Kumar allegedly struck the 60-year-old victim Anil Mistry on the head with a khanti during a water dispute, resulting in death, with charges upgraded to murder under Section 103(1) BNS. Despite Kumar's claims of false implication and his clean record, the court determined that the specific role attributed to him in the victim's statement, combined with medical evidence confirming the fatal head injury, rendered him ineligible for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts