State of Bihar vs Tuntun Singh and others — 725/2008

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRNL010000152008

Filing Number

725/2008

Filing Date

24-Jan-2008

Registration No

725/2008

Registration Date

24-Jan-2008

Court

Nalanda DJ Div.

Judge

3-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

PARWALPUR

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 376

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

    Adv. Dilip Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tuntun Singh and others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Tuntun Singh (725/2008) Decision: Both accused, Karu Singh and Barhan Yadav, were acquitted of rape charges (IPC §376/34) for lack of evidence. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to examine a single witness during trial, including the victim and investigating officer. The court held that without credible evidence establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt—particularly victim testimony in sexual assault cases—conviction cannot be sustained. The court found no proof of pre-arranged conspiracy required under §34 IPC, and applied the principle that suspicion alone cannot substitute for legal proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  13. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  14. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  15. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  16. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  17. 02-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  18. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  19. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  20. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  21. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  22. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  23. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  24. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  25. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  26. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  27. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  28. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  29. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  30. 20-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  31. 19-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  32. 06-May-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  33. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  34. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  35. 12-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  36. 21-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  37. 08-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  38. 11-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  39. 08-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  40. 01-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  41. 12-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  42. 12-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  43. 03-May-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  44. 28-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  45. 01-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  46. 21-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  47. 22-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  48. 03-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  49. 10-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  50. 05-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  51. 29-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  52. 14-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  53. 24-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  54. 23-Feb-2022

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  55. 02-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  56. 10-Jan-2022

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  57. 02-Nov-2021

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  58. 21-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  59. 01-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  60. 04-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  61. 10-Jun-2021

    Appearance

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  62. 01-Apr-2021

    Appearance

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  63. 17-Feb-2021

    Appearance

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  64. 15-Jan-2021

    Appearance

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  65. 11-Dec-2020

    Appearance

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  66. 05-Oct-2020

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  67. 03-Sep-2020

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  68. 18-Jul-2020

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  69. 02-Jun-2020

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  70. 16-Apr-2020

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  71. 12-Mar-2020

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  72. 11-Feb-2020

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  73. 16-Jan-2020

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  74. 24-Dec-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  75. 10-Dec-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  76. 29-Nov-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  77. 16-Nov-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  78. 15-Oct-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  79. 16-Sep-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  80. 16-Aug-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  81. 16-Jul-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  82. 17-Jun-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  83. 20-May-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  84. 22-Apr-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  85. 20-Apr-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  86. 18-Mar-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  87. 18-Feb-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  88. 22-Jan-2019

    Charge

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  89. 10-Dec-2018

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  90. 06-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  91. 24-Jan-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. 725/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Tuntun Singh (725/2008) Decision: Both accused, Karu Singh and Barhan Yadav, were acquitted of rape charges (IPC §376/34) for lack of evidence. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to examine a single witness during trial, including the victim and investigating officer. The court held that without credible evidence establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt—particularly victim testimony in sexual assault cases—conviction cannot be sustained. The court found no proof of pre-arranged conspiracy required under §34 IPC, and applied the principle that suspicion alone cannot substitute for legal proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case