Musmat Surti Devi vs Urmila Devi — 1190/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126((2),127(2),329(4),115(2),109,303(2),352,351(3). Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Appearence Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Cr. Case Complaint (P)

CNR: BRMZ040024432024

Filing Number

2443/2024

Filing Date

27-Jul-2024

Registration No

1190/2024

Registration Date

27-Jul-2024

Court

Muzaffarpur West CJM Div.

Judge

5-Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126((2),127(2),329(4),115(2),109,303(2),352,351(3)
The Prevention of Witches and Daain Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Musmat Surti Devi

    Adv. Dharmendra Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Urmila Devi

  2. 2.Vikas Kumar

  3. 3.Amit Kumar

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  5. 12-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  6. 14-Oct-2025

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  7. 17-Sep-2025

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  8. 05-Aug-2025

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  9. 30-May-2025

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  10. 22-Apr-2025

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  11. 24-Mar-2025

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  12. 18-Feb-2025

    Appearence

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  13. 10-Feb-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court found sufficient prima facie evidence under sections 126(2)/115(2)/303(2)/352/351(3) of the BNS and sections 3/4 of the Daain Act against all three accused persons (Urmila Devi, Vikash Kumar, and Amit Kumar). The complainant has been directed to file requisites within 7 days, after which summons will be issued against the accused persons. The case is adjourned to 18-02-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 10-Feb-2025

    Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  15. 30-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  16. 21-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  17. 09-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  18. 19-Dec-2024

    Enquiry Witness

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  19. 05-Dec-2024

    Enquiry Witness

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  20. 25-Nov-2024

    Enquiry Witness

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  21. 28-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Court No 5 of J.M 1st class,West

  22. 18-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Acjm-1,West

  23. 03-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Acjm-1,West

  24. 09-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 27-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1190/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court found sufficient prima facie evidence under sections 126(2)/115(2)/303(2)/352/351(3) of the BNS and sections 3/4 of the Daain Act against all three accused persons (Urmila Devi, Vikash Kumar, and Amit Kumar). The complainant has been directed to file requisites within 7 days, after which summons will be issued against the accused persons. The case is adjourned to 18-02-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case