State of Bihar vs MD. AMJAD — 829/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,504,307,323,354,379. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRMZ010167602023

Filing Number

16753/2023

Filing Date

16-Oct-2023

Registration No

829/2023

Registration Date

16-Oct-2023

Court

Muzaffarpur DJ Div.

Judge

4-Dasj-5

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,504,307,323,354,379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

    Adv. Spl.PP, Muzaffarpur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MD. AMJAD

  2. 2.MAINUDDIN

  3. 3.SAIYAMUDDIN

  4. 4.SARFARAJ

  5. 5.CHAMAN

  6. 6.MD NAZIM

  7. 7.NAUSHAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The court acquitted all seven accused persons of charges under IPC sections 147, 323, 504, 307, 354, and 379/149, finding that the prosecution witnesses' testimonies were contradictory and failed to establish the alleged assault case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the two main witnesses (complainant and his wife) gave conflicting accounts during cross-examination, and applying the legal principle that benefit of doubt goes to the accused, ordered their acquittal and release from bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj-5

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Dasj-5

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Dasj-5

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Dasj-5

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  10. 22-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  11. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  12. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  14. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  15. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  16. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  17. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  18. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  19. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  20. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  21. 07-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  22. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  23. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  24. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  25. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  26. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  27. 24-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  28. 27-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  29. 13-May-2024

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  30. 23-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  31. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  32. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  33. 22-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  34. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Dasj-5

  35. 23-Nov-2023

    Charge

    Dasj-5

  36. 19-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 16-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 829/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted all seven accused persons of charges under IPC sections 147, 323, 504, 307, 354, and 379/149, finding that the prosecution witnesses' testimonies were contradictory and failed to establish the alleged assault case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the two main witnesses (complainant and his wife) gave conflicting accounts during cross-examination, and applying the legal principle that benefit of doubt goes to the accused, ordered their acquittal and release from bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case