State of Bihar vs MD. AMJAD — 829/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,504,307,323,354,379. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRMZ010167602023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
16753/2023
Filing Date
16-10-2023
Registration No
829/2023
Registration Date
16-10-2023
Court
Muzaffarpur DJ Div.
Judge
4-DASJ-5
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Bihar
Adv. Spl.PP, Muzaffarpur
Respondent(s)
MD. AMJAD
MAINUDDIN
SAIYAMUDDIN
SARFARAJ
CHAMAN
MD NAZIM
NAUSHAD
Hearing History
Judge: 4-DASJ-5
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
Arguments
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted all seven accused persons of charges under IPC sections 147, 323, 504, 307, 354, and 379/149, finding that the prosecution witnesses' testimonies were contradictory and failed to establish the alleged assault case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the two main witnesses (complainant and his wife) gave conflicting accounts during cross-examination, and applying the legal principle that benefit of doubt goes to the accused, ordered their acquittal and release from bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted all seven accused persons of charges under IPC sections 147, 323, 504, 307, 354, and 379/149, finding that the prosecution witnesses' testimonies were contradictory and failed to establish the alleged assault case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the two main witnesses (complainant and his wife) gave conflicting accounts during cross-examination, and applying the legal principle that benefit of doubt goes to the accused, ordered their acquittal and release from bail obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts