Jitendra Paswan vs State of bihar — 991/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,447,341,323,379,504/34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRMZ010034482026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
3128/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
991/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
Muzaffarpur DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jitendra Paswan
Adv. Pramod Kumar Sharma
Dhirendra Paswan
Deepak Kumar urf Deepak Paswan
Respondent(s)
State of bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, granted pre-arrest bail to three accused (Jitendra Paswan, Dhirendra Paswan, and Deepak Kumar) in a 2013 case involving charges of attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and theft. The court allowed bail after the informant testified that the neighborly dispute had been amicably settled and he no longer wished to prosecute, with no prosecution apprehension about flight or reoffense. The accused were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigations and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, granted pre-arrest bail to three accused (Jitendra Paswan, Dhirendra Paswan, and Deepak Kumar) in a 2013 case involving charges of attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and theft. The court allowed bail after the informant testified that the neighborly dispute had been amicably settled and he no longer wished to prosecute, with no prosecution apprehension about flight or reoffense. The accused were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigations and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts