Jitendra Paswan vs State of bihar — 991/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,447,341,323,379,504/34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMZ010034482026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

3128/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

991/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

Muzaffarpur DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307,447,341,323,379,504/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jitendra Paswan

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Sharma

  2. 2.Dhirendra Paswan

  3. 3.Deepak Kumar urf Deepak Paswan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, granted pre-arrest bail to three accused (Jitendra Paswan, Dhirendra Paswan, and Deepak Kumar) in a 2013 case involving charges of attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and theft. The court allowed bail after the informant testified that the neighborly dispute had been amicably settled and he no longer wished to prosecute, with no prosecution apprehension about flight or reoffense. The accused were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigations and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 991/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, granted pre-arrest bail to three accused (Jitendra Paswan, Dhirendra Paswan, and Deepak Kumar) in a 2013 case involving charges of attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and theft. The court allowed bail after the informant testified that the neighborly dispute had been amicably settled and he no longer wished to prosecute, with no prosecution apprehension about flight or reoffense. The accused were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigations and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case