Nitesh Kumar vs State of bihar — 987/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,132,221,223,224,351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMZ010034412026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

3123/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

987/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

Muzaffarpur DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,132,221,223,224,351(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nitesh Kumar

    Adv. Abhishek Parasar

  2. 2.Himanshu Kumar

  3. 3.Adarsh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur granted pre-arrest bail to three accused (Nitesh Kumar, Himanshu Kumar, and Adarsh Kumar) charged with playing vulgar songs during a Saraswati puja immersion and misbehaving with police. The court accepted their bail petition considering they were first-time offenders with no risk of absconding, and ordered their release on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each, subject to standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 987/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur granted pre-arrest bail to three accused (Nitesh Kumar, Himanshu Kumar, and Adarsh Kumar) charged with playing vulgar songs during a Saraswati puja immersion and misbehaving with police. The court accepted their bail petition considering they were first-time offenders with no risk of absconding, and ordered their release on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each, subject to standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case