Ranjeet Kumar vs State of bihar — 946/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 414,420,467,468,471,472,120(b)/34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMZ010032992026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

2995/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

946/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Muzaffarpur DJ Div.

Judge

3-Dasj-1

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 414,420,467,468,471,472,120(b)/34
Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26,35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ranjeet Kumar

    Adv. MUKESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    JUDGMENT SUMMARY The Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur granted anticipatory bail to Ranjeet Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 120(B), 34 and Arms Act sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35. The court found that allegations against the petitioner were vague and omnibus in nature, he was not named in the FIR (surfaced only through a co-accused's confession), no arms/ammunition were recovered from him, and similar co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj-1

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-1

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 946/2026

casestatus.in Summary

JUDGMENT SUMMARY The Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur granted anticipatory bail to Ranjeet Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 120(B), 34 and Arms Act sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35. The court found that allegations against the petitioner were vague and omnibus in nature, he was not named in the FIR (surfaced only through a co-accused's confession), no arms/ammunition were recovered from him, and similar co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case