Rahul Kumar vs State of bihar — 208/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,387,307,379,504,506/34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRMZ010020292026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

1822/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

208/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

Muzaffarpur DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,387,307,379,504,506/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Kumar

    Adv. Krishnadeo kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur granted regular bail to Rahul Kumar in a case involving charges of extortion, assault, and criminal intimidation. The court based its decision on Kumar being a first-time offender, his extended custody since December 2025, and the prosecution's failure to produce critical evidence like the injury report despite court orders, coupled with no demonstrated flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 208/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur granted regular bail to Rahul Kumar in a case involving charges of extortion, assault, and criminal intimidation. The court based its decision on Kumar being a first-time offender, his extended custody since December 2025, and the prosecution's failure to produce critical evidence like the injury report despite court orders, coupled with no demonstrated flight risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case