Sunaina Devi vs State of Bihar — 483/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),316(2),336(3),338,351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMZ010018102026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

1634/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

483/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

Muzaffarpur DJ Div.

Judge

3-Dasj-1

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),316(2),336(3),338,351(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunaina Devi

    Adv. Raj Kumar Thakur

  2. 2.Rajkishore Sah

    Adv. Raj Kumar Thakur

  3. 3.Vikash Kumar

    Adv. Raj Kumar Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused petitioners (Sunaina Devi, Rajkishore Sah, and Vikash Kumar) charged with cheating, forgery, and criminal breach of trust in a case involving unauthorized mortgaging of land to secure a bank loan. The judge found no prima facie criminal intention, noting the accused are family members of the informant, have no criminal history, and are regularly repaying loan installments. The petitioners were directed to be released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj-1

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-1

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-1

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 483/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to three accused petitioners (Sunaina Devi, Rajkishore Sah, and Vikash Kumar) charged with cheating, forgery, and criminal breach of trust in a case involving unauthorized mortgaging of land to secure a bank loan. The judge found no prima facie criminal intention, noting the accused are family members of the informant, have no criminal history, and are regularly repaying loan installments. The petitioners were directed to be released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case