VIJAY KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 223/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRMP010014562026

Filing Number

1373/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

223/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Madhepura

Judge

22-I/c District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

GAWALPARA

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 394
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY KUMAR

    Adv. Sandhya Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of Order

    Case Summary The court granted regular bail to accused Vijay Kumar in Gwalpara P.S. Case No-58/2023 on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court found that while the accused had prior criminal history, he had been in judicial custody for over three months since November 17, 2025, and was a primary accused in an FIR under IPC Section 394 (dacoity). The court imposed the condition that the accused shall not repeat such offenses and both sureties must be family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    I/c District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    I/c District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    I/c District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    I/c District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    I/c District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 223/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court granted regular bail to accused Vijay Kumar in Gwalpara P.S. Case No-58/2023 on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court found that while the accused had prior criminal history, he had been in judicial custody for over three months since November 17, 2025, and was a primary accused in an FIR under IPC Section 394 (dacoity). The court imposed the condition that the accused shall not repeat such offenses and both sureties must be family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case