VIJAY KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 221/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2), 96, 3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th May 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRMP010014512026
Filing Number
1368/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
221/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Madhepura
Judge
29-District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
BIHARI GANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY KUMAR
Adv. NARESH SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court rejected Bijay Kumar's bail petition in a kidnapping case involving a minor girl. The court found that the victim's statement confirmed she eloped and married the petitioner voluntarily, but crucially, the victim was born on 12.09.2012 and was therefore a minor at the time of occurrence. The court held that the petitioner unlawfully retained the minor without her legal guardian's permission, and with corroborating witness and informant statements supporting the prosecution case, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI
-
05-May-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI
-
21-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 221/2026
The court rejected Bijay Kumar's bail petition in a kidnapping case involving a minor girl. The court found that the victim's statement confirmed she eloped and married the petitioner voluntarily, but crucially, the victim was born on 12.09.2012 and was therefore a minor at the time of occurrence. The court held that the petitioner unlawfully retained the minor without her legal guardian's permission, and with corroborating witness and informant statements supporting the prosecution case, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts