BIMAL KUMAR ALIAS BIMAL KUMAR MUKHIYA vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 123/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRMP010004652026
Filing Number
431/2026
Filing Date
24-Jan-2026
Registration No
123/2026
Registration Date
24-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Madhepura
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
776
Police Station
MADHEPURA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIMAL KUMAR ALIAS BIMAL KUMAR MUKHIYA
Adv. ANAND KISHOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 123/2026 The court denied Bimal Kumar's petition for anticipatory bail in a corruption case involving alleged misappropriation of public funds under government schemes. The judge found the charges serious, noting the petitioner's criminal antecedent with five prior cases and that the investigation was ongoing with supporting witness evidence. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the lower court and seek regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 123/2026
Case Summary: 123/2026 The court denied Bimal Kumar's petition for anticipatory bail in a corruption case involving alleged misappropriation of public funds under government schemes. The judge found the charges serious, noting the petitioner's criminal antecedent with five prior cases and that the investigation was ongoing with supporting witness evidence. The petitioner was directed to surrender before the lower court and seek regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts