Nitish Kumar vs 4-Unknown — 369/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 29th April 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRMG010065052018
Filing Number
4676/2018
Filing Date
12-Dec-2018
Registration No
369/2018
Registration Date
12-Dec-2018
Court
DJ Div. Munger
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
140
Police Station
JAMALPUR.
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nitish Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.4-Unknown
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Judgement CopyView PDF
The court acquitted both accused persons, Roshan Kumar and Govind Kumar, of charges under IPC Section 395 (dacoity) dated 29.04.2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the sole prosecution witness claimed to know nothing about the incident and had not made any statement to police, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-May-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-May-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Dec-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Oct-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Aug-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jun-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jan-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Nov-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Jul-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jun-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-May-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-May-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Apr-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Nov-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Sep-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jul-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jun-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Apr-2021
Evidence
-
02-Mar-2021
Evidence
-
25-Jan-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Nov-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Aug-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jun-2020
Evidence
-
20-May-2020
Evidence
-
16-Apr-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jan-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Nov-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Oct-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Jul-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Jul-2019
Evidence
-
11-Jun-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Apr-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jan-2019
Hearing.
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jan-2019
Hearing.
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 369/2018
The court acquitted both accused persons, Roshan Kumar and Govind Kumar, of charges under IPC Section 395 (dacoity) dated 29.04.2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the sole prosecution witness claimed to know nothing about the incident and had not made any statement to police, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts