BAMBAM KUMAR YADAV vs BIHAR — 212/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),316(5),319(4),338,336(3),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRMG010013802026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1302/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
212/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Munger
Judge
9-District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BAMBAM KUMAR YADAV
Adv. BISHWAJEET KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 9-District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-02-2026 | HEARING. | |
| 16-02-2026 | HEARING. | |
| 13-02-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District and Sessions Court, Munger, granted anticipatory bail to Baburam Kumar Yadav in a criminal case (Case No. 212/2026) filed by Rajesh Kumar. The petitioner was accused of cheating regarding land sale; he allegedly sold land to the complainant for ₹27,00,000, but the land had already been acquired by National Highway Authority in 2022 and the accused received compensation without transferring ownership to the buyer. The court found no direct evidence of money received by the petitioner himself, noted his clean criminal record, and released him on bail with conditions including furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties and adherence to bail conditions under CrPC Section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District and Sessions Court, Munger, granted anticipatory bail to Baburam Kumar Yadav in a criminal case (Case No. 212/2026) filed by Rajesh Kumar. The petitioner was accused of cheating regarding land sale; he allegedly sold land to the complainant for ₹27,00,000, but the land had already been acquired by National Highway Authority in 2022 and the accused received compensation without transferring ownership to the buyer. The court found no direct evidence of money received by the petitioner himself, noted his clean criminal record, and released him on bail with conditions including furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties and adherence to bail conditions under CrPC Section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts