GAURAV KUMAR vs BIHAR — 103/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRMG010007512026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
719/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
103/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Munger
Judge
9-District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Cyber thana Munger
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAURAV KUMAR
Adv. GUNJAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 9-District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd
Disposed
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
HEARING.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING. | |
| 10-02-2026 | HEARING. | |
| 24-01-2026 | HEARING. | |
| 22-01-2026 | HEARING. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge at Munger granted bail to applicant Gaurav Kumar on March 9, 2026, in a cybercrime case (Cyber Thana FIR No. 22/2025) involving allegations under IPC Section 318(4) and IT Act Section 66(D). The court found no credible evidence linking the applicant to the fraudulent transfer of ₹4 lakh from the informant's bank account to a third party (Sukanta Bebbarma), noting the applicant was merely an HDFC Bank employee with no direct involvement in the transaction. Bail was granted with conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, two sureties, and full cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge at Munger granted bail to applicant Gaurav Kumar on March 9, 2026, in a cybercrime case (Cyber Thana FIR No. 22/2025) involving allegations under IPC Section 318(4) and IT Act Section 66(D). The court found no credible evidence linking the applicant to the fraudulent transfer of ₹4 lakh from the informant's bank account to a third party (Sukanta Bebbarma), noting the applicant was merely an HDFC Bank employee with no direct involvement in the transaction. Bail was granted with conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, two sureties, and full cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts