GAURAV KUMAR vs BIHAR — 103/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRMG010007512026
Filing Number
719/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
103/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Munger
Judge
9-District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Cyber thana Munger
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAURAV KUMAR
Adv. GUNJAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge at Munger granted bail to applicant Gaurav Kumar on March 9, 2026, in a cybercrime case (Cyber Thana FIR No. 22/2025) involving allegations under IPC Section 318(4) and IT Act Section 66(D). The court found no credible evidence linking the applicant to the fraudulent transfer of ₹4 lakh from the informant's bank account to a third party (Sukanta Bebbarma), noting the applicant was merely an HDFC Bank employee with no direct involvement in the transaction. Bail was granted with conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, two sureties, and full cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing.
District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing.
District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing.
District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 103/2026
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge at Munger granted bail to applicant Gaurav Kumar on March 9, 2026, in a cybercrime case (Cyber Thana FIR No. 22/2025) involving allegations under IPC Section 318(4) and IT Act Section 66(D). The court found no credible evidence linking the applicant to the fraudulent transfer of ₹4 lakh from the informant's bank account to a third party (Sukanta Bebbarma), noting the applicant was merely an HDFC Bank employee with no direct involvement in the transaction. Bail was granted with conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, two sureties, and full cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts