GAURAV KUMAR vs BIHAR — 103/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMG010007512026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

719/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Munger

Judge

9-District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

Cyber thana Munger

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4)
I.T. Act 2000 Section 66(D)

Petitioner(s)

GAURAV KUMAR

Adv. GUNJAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 9-District and Additional Sessions Judge 2nd

09-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

HEARING.

10-02-2026

HEARING.

24-01-2026

HEARING.

22-01-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Bail Order

Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge at Munger granted bail to applicant Gaurav Kumar on March 9, 2026, in a cybercrime case (Cyber Thana FIR No. 22/2025) involving allegations under IPC Section 318(4) and IT Act Section 66(D). The court found no credible evidence linking the applicant to the fraudulent transfer of ₹4 lakh from the informant's bank account to a third party (Sukanta Bebbarma), noting the applicant was merely an HDFC Bank employee with no direct involvement in the transaction. Bail was granted with conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, two sureties, and full cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge at Munger granted bail to applicant Gaurav Kumar on March 9, 2026, in a cybercrime case (Cyber Thana FIR No. 22/2025) involving allegations under IPC Section 318(4) and IT Act Section 66(D). The court found no credible evidence linking the applicant to the fraudulent transfer of ₹4 lakh from the informant's bank account to a third party (Sukanta Bebbarma), noting the applicant was merely an HDFC Bank employee with no direct involvement in the transaction. Bail was granted with conditions including a ₹10,000 bond, two sureties, and full cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Munger All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case