MD ASIF ALIAS PAPPU vs MD ASIF ALIAS SAFI HAQBAL — 1001772/2008

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,147,448,477,337,504. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRMB210004232008

Filing Number

1001772/2008

Filing Date

29-Jul-2008

Registration No

1001772/2008

Registration Date

29-Jul-2008

Court

Benipatti CJM Division

Judge

14-Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

199

Police Station

BENIPATTI

Year

2008

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,147,448,477,337,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD ASIF ALIAS PAPPU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MD ASIF ALIAS SAFI HAQBAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The court acquitted accused persons Md. Ashif @ Pappu and Md. Ashique @ Safi of charges under Sections 147, 323, 341, 448, 427, 337, and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, finding that the prosecution completely failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of evidence. The court held the burden of proof always rests on the prosecution, and since no material evidence was available on record, the accused were set at liberty with their bail bonds discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Jul-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1001772/2008

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted accused persons Md. Ashif @ Pappu and Md. Ashique @ Safi of charges under Sections 147, 323, 341, 448, 427, 337, and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, finding that the prosecution completely failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of evidence. The court held the burden of proof always rests on the prosecution, and since no material evidence was available on record, the accused were set at liberty with their bail bonds discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case