SURESH MUKHIYA vs MANOJ KR YADAV — 67/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 01st April 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRMB210001372015
Filing Number
67/2015
Filing Date
13-Jan-2015
Registration No
67/2015
Registration Date
13-Jan-2015
Court
Benipatti CJM Division
Judge
14-Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
09
Police Station
BENIPATTI
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH MUKHIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANOJ KR YADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate acquitted Manoj Kumar Yadav of charges under Section 454 IPC (housebreaking), finding that the prosecution failed to present any material evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Following the fundamental principle that the burden of proof always rests on the prosecution and the accused is presumed innocent until proven otherwise, the court ordered his immediate release from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
23-Mar-2026
Custody
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
11-Mar-2026
Custody
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
27-Feb-2026
Custody
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
17-Feb-2026
Custody
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
11-Feb-2026
Restored
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
11-Feb-2026
Custody
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
07-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
21-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
18-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-II
-
07-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
23-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
17-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
16-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
17-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
04-Sep-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
04-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
08-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
11-May-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
27-Apr-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
31-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
28-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
14-Jan-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
22-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
30-Aug-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
04-Jul-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
27-Jun-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-VIII
-
11-May-2022
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
15-Mar-2022
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
22-Jan-2022
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
18-Nov-2021
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
16-Nov-2021
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
11-Aug-2021
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
27-May-2021
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
16-Apr-2021
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
08-Apr-2021
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
10-Feb-2021
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
04-Feb-2021
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
11-Dec-2020
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
03-Dec-2020
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
25-Sep-2020
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
17-Sep-2020
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
16-Jul-2020
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
03-Jun-2020
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
16-Apr-2020
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
16-Mar-2020
Evidence
A.C.J.M-II
-
17-Dec-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
26-Sep-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Aug-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
28-May-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
23-Mar-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
20-Feb-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
19-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 67/2015
The Judicial Magistrate acquitted Manoj Kumar Yadav of charges under Section 454 IPC (housebreaking), finding that the prosecution failed to present any material evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Following the fundamental principle that the burden of proof always rests on the prosecution and the accused is presumed innocent until proven otherwise, the court ordered his immediate release from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts