Pramod Sah alias Pramod Kumar Sah vs The State of Bihar — 71/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.
Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION
CNR: BRMB100009652025
Filing Number
958/2025
Filing Date
15-May-2025
Registration No
71/2025
Registration Date
15-May-2025
Court
DJ Div. Jhanjharpur
Judge
13-Dasj- III
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
346
Police Station
MR Case
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pramod Sah alias Pramod Kumar Sah
Adv. Sanjay Kumar Sinha
-
2.Sunar Sah alias Shyam Sundar Sah
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Sri Prasad Mukhiya
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 71/2025 The District and Additional Sessions Court in Jhanjharpur dismissed the revision petition filed by Pramod Sah and Sunar Sah, finding it not maintainable. The original order dated 11-04-2025 had imposed a one-year peace bond on both parties with mutual security of two lakh rupees each to prevent breach of peace arising from an earlier dispute; since this period had already expired by 11-04-2026 when the revision was filed, the order became ineffective and intervention was deemed unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Dasj- III
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj- III
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Dasj- III
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing
Dasj- III
-
29-Oct-2025
Hearing
Dasj- III
-
22-Aug-2025
Hearing
Dasj- III
-
27-Jun-2025
Hearing
Dasj- III
-
23-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2025
Summary of Case 71/2025 The District and Additional Sessions Court in Jhanjharpur dismissed the revision petition filed by Pramod Sah and Sunar Sah, finding it not maintainable. The original order dated 11-04-2025 had imposed a one-year peace bond on both parties with mutual security of two lakh rupees each to prevent breach of peace arising from an earlier dispute; since this period had already expired by 11-04-2026 when the revision was filed, the order became ineffective and intervention was deemed unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts