Durgesh Kumar vs The State of Bihar — 107/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,61(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRMB100006632026

Filing Number

660/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

107/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jhanjharpur

Judge

11-Dasj-I

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

444

Police Station

PHULPARAS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,61(2)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Durgesh Kumar

    Adv. NAGESHWAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected Durgesh Kumar's bail petition in a murder case where he allegedly participated in killing the informant's son on 23.10.2025. The court found sufficient evidence against him, including witness testimony, a co-accused's confession naming him, recovery of the weapon used, and a postmortem report corroborating the prosecution's case, warranting his continued custody given the gravity of the offense under BNS Sections 103, 61(2) and Arms Act Section 27. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj-I

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Durgesh Kumar's bail petition in a murder case where he allegedly participated in killing the informant's son on 23.10.2025. The court found sufficient evidence against him, including witness testimony, a co-accused's confession naming him, recovery of the weapon used, and a postmortem report corroborating the prosecution's case, warranting his continued custody given the gravity of the offense under BNS Sections 103, 61(2) and Arms Act Section 27. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case