Md Abdul Rajjk alias Md Rajjak vs The State of Bihar — 163/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMB100006522026

Filing Number

649/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jhanjharpur

Judge

11-Dasj-I

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN AS SATISFIED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2

Police Station

LAUKAHA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md Abdul Rajjk alias Md Rajjak

    Adv. Balram Kumar Jha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed Md. Abdul Rajjak's anticipatory bail petition as withdrawn on 06.05.2026. The petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal after a previous bail petition (ABP 386/2025) had already been rejected on merit, and the State did not object to the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj-I

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  7. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  9. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  12. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  13. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed Md. Abdul Rajjak's anticipatory bail petition as withdrawn on 06.05.2026. The petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal after a previous bail petition (ABP 386/2025) had already been rejected on merit, and the State did not object to the withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case