Shyam Lal Das vs Baidya Nath Das @ Boindo Das — 63/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--DECREE on 11th March 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRKT120000972021
Filing Number
97/2021
Filing Date
02-Nov-2021
Registration No
63/2021
Registration Date
02-Nov-2021
Court
Barsoi Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREE
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shyam Lal Das
Adv. Md. Nazir Alam
Respondent(s)
-
1.Baidya Nath Das @ Boindo Das
-
2.Sangita Kumari
-
3.Hina Devi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Barsoi, Katihar declared void and set aside the registered sale-deed No. 9883 dated 23.07.2021, finding that the plaintiff executed it under pressure arising from a pending rape case against his son, without receiving any consideration. The court held that the agreement underlying the sale was void under Section 28 of the Contract Act 1872, as it constituted an unlawful restraint on legal proceedings, and the defendants breached the compromise terms by refusing to withdraw the criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Judgement
Sub judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sub judge
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub judge
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence
Sub judge
-
05-Oct-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub judge
-
12-Aug-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub judge
-
03-Jun-2024
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Sub judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Appearence
Sub judge
-
18-Mar-2024
Appearence
Sub judge
-
05-Feb-2024
Appearence
Sub judge
-
13-Dec-2023
Appearence
Sub judge
-
04-Oct-2023
Appearence
Sub judge
-
26-Jul-2023
Appearence
Sub judge
-
14-Jun-2023
Appearence
Sub judge
-
26-Apr-2023
Appearence
Sub judge
-
13-Mar-2023
Appearence
Sub judge
-
01-Feb-2023
Appearence
Sub judge
-
11-Jan-2023
Appearence
Sub judge
-
30-Nov-2022
Appearence
Sub judge
-
10-Oct-2022
Appearence
Sub judge
-
31-Aug-2022
Appearence
Sub judge
-
10-Aug-2022
Appearence
Sub judge
-
13-Jul-2022
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
22-Jun-2022
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
30-May-2022
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
20-Apr-2022
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
31-Mar-2022
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
27-Jan-2022
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
13-Jan-2022
Hearing On Addmission
Sub judge
-
10-Jan-2022
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
06-Jan-2022
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
23-Dec-2021
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
16-Dec-2021
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
13-Dec-2021
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
01-Dec-2021
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
15-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Nov-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 63/2021
Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Barsoi, Katihar declared void and set aside the registered sale-deed No. 9883 dated 23.07.2021, finding that the plaintiff executed it under pressure arising from a pending rape case against his son, without receiving any consideration. The court held that the agreement underlying the sale was void under Section 28 of the Contract Act 1872, as it constituted an unlawful restraint on legal proceedings, and the defendants breached the compromise terms by refusing to withdraw the criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts