MAHESH KUMAR BHAGAT vs KAILSH BHAGAT AND OTHERS — 101002/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th March 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRKT120000912015
Filing Number
101002/2015
Filing Date
09-Oct-2015
Registration No
101002/2015
Registration Date
09-Oct-2015
Court
Barsoi Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH KUMAR BHAGAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAILSH BHAGAT AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Judgment
Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge at Barsoi, Katihar dismissed the plaintiff's pre-emption suit against the defendants. The court found that the suit property had already been partitioned among family members in 1997, with each co-sharer receiving separate possession of their respective shares. Since the property was no longer held as joint Hindu family property at the time of the contested sale deeds dated 11.10.2014, the plaintiff's right to pre-emption under Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act could not be exercised. The court awarded costs of ₹40,000 to the contesting defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Sub judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Sub judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Sub judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
15-Jan-2026
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
29-May-2025
Hearing
Sub judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Order
-
17-Apr-2025
Order
Sub judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Order
Sub judge
-
27-Feb-2025
Order
Sub judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Hearing
Sub judge
-
16-Jan-2025
Hearing
Sub judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Rejoinder
Sub judge
-
14-Nov-2024
W.S
Sub judge
-
26-Sep-2024
W.S
Sub judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Order
-
22-Aug-2024
W.S
Sub judge
-
27-Jun-2024
Order
Sub judge
-
25-Apr-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
04-Apr-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
15-Feb-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
11-Jan-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
23-Nov-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
05-Oct-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
24-Aug-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
13-Jul-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
08-Jun-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
11-May-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
20-Apr-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
23-Feb-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
12-Jan-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
17-Nov-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
20-Oct-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
15-Sep-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
04-Aug-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
30-Jun-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
26-May-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
08-Apr-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
21-Jan-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
03-Nov-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
07-Sep-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
03-Aug-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
29-Jun-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
20-Apr-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
25-Feb-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
17-Dec-2020
Hearing
Sub judge
-
06-Nov-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
03-Sep-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
16-Jul-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
04-Jun-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
26-Mar-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
09-Jan-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
12-Dec-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
09-Oct-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
07-Aug-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
23-Aug-2018
Hearing
Sub judge
-
02-Aug-2018
Hearing
Sub judge
-
19-Jul-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 101002/2015
Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge at Barsoi, Katihar dismissed the plaintiff's pre-emption suit against the defendants. The court found that the suit property had already been partitioned among family members in 1997, with each co-sharer receiving separate possession of their respective shares. Since the property was no longer held as joint Hindu family property at the time of the contested sale deeds dated 11.10.2014, the plaintiff's right to pre-emption under Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act could not be exercised. The court awarded costs of ₹40,000 to the contesting defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts