Md. Manowar Alam vs Md. Salimur Rahman — 8/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRKT120000192022
Filing Number
19/2022
Filing Date
07-Feb-2022
Registration No
8/2022
Registration Date
07-Feb-2022
Court
Barsoi Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub judge
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Md. Manowar Alam
Adv. Govind Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.Md. Salimur Rahman
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
14-May-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
05-Apr-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The plaintiff's petition to add two vendors (who purchased the suit land during the pendency of litigation) as defendants has been dismissed. The court held that the principle of *lis pendens* (pending litigation) automatically binds any subsequent sale of the disputed property, making it unnecessary to add new parties. The case is adjourned to 14.05.2025 for first hearing, with both parties directed to file their documents by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Apr-2025
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Order
Sub judge
-
18-Dec-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
20-Nov-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
09-Oct-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
11-Sep-2024
Hearing
Sub judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Order
Sub judge
-
20-May-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
27-Feb-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
26-Feb-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
31-Jan-2024
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
20-Dec-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
16-Oct-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
13-Sep-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
23-Aug-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
07-Aug-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
10-Jul-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
07-Jun-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
26-Apr-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Sub judge
-
17-Mar-2023
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
09-Jan-2023
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
10-Dec-2022
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
12-Oct-2022
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Sub judge
-
19-Sep-2022
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
12-Jul-2022
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
29-Jun-2022
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
08-Jun-2022
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
25-May-2022
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
02-Mar-2022
Stistedar Report
Sub judge
-
21-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2022
Summary: The plaintiff's petition to add two vendors (who purchased the suit land during the pendency of litigation) as defendants has been dismissed. The court held that the principle of *lis pendens* (pending litigation) automatically binds any subsequent sale of the disputed property, making it unnecessary to add new parties. The case is adjourned to 14.05.2025 for first hearing, with both parties directed to file their documents by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts