VINOD BHAGAT vs DAWARIK PRASAD BHAGAT — 25/2007
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRKT120000152007
Filing Number
25/2007
Filing Date
03-Mar-2007
Registration No
25/2007
Registration Date
03-Mar-2007
Court
Barsoi Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub judge
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINOD BHAGAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAWARIK PRASAD BHAGAT
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
Arguments
Sub judge
-
07-May-2026
Evidence
Sub judge
-
23-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Sub judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Sub judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Order
Sub judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Order
Sub judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
Sub judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Sub judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Sub judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Rejoinder
Sub judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Rejoinder
Sub judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
03-May-2025
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
15-Feb-2025
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
23-Nov-2024
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
07-Sep-2024
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
26-Jun-2024
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
06-May-2024
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
04-Mar-2024
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
08-Jan-2024
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Stayed U./S.10 Of CPC
Sub judge
-
25-Sep-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
21-Aug-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
17-Jul-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
05-Jun-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
24-Apr-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
13-Mar-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
04-Feb-2023
Hearing
Sub judge
-
28-Nov-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
07-Nov-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
20-Oct-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
19-Sep-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
29-Aug-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
08-Aug-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
27-Jul-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
11-Jul-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
06-Jun-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
27-Apr-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
30-Mar-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
14-Mar-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
21-Feb-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
17-Jan-2022
Hearing
Sub judge
-
20-Dec-2021
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: The plaintiff's application for amendment to the suit petition filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC has been dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff sought to introduce new land parcels and facts into the suit filed in 2007 after plaintiff's evidence was closed in 2018, which would fundamentally alter the nature of the suit—the disputed property increased from 1.81 acres to 4.13 acres. The court held the amendment application was not maintainable as it was unjustified and the plaintiff had ample opportunity to file such amendments earlier but failed to do so. The case is now set for defendant's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Dec-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
15-Dec-2021
Order
Sub judge
-
30-Sep-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
13-Sep-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
26-Aug-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
15-Jul-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
17-Jun-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
20-May-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
22-Apr-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
04-Mar-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
01-Mar-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
04-Feb-2021
Hearing
Sub judge
-
17-Dec-2020
Hearing
Sub judge
-
26-Nov-2020
Hearing
Sub judge
-
24-Sep-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
06-Aug-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
02-Jul-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
16-Apr-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
27-Feb-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
28-Jan-2020
Hearing
Munsif
-
30-Oct-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
04-Sep-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
30-Jul-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
30-May-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
02-May-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
13-Mar-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
13-Feb-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
30-Jan-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
02-Jan-2019
Hearing
Sub judge
-
05-Nov-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2007
Case filed
Registration No. 25/2007
Case Summary: The plaintiff's application for amendment to the suit petition filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC has been dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff sought to introduce new land parcels and facts into the suit filed in 2007 after plaintiff's evidence was closed in 2018, which would fundamentally alter the nature of the suit—the disputed property increased from 1.81 acres to 4.13 acres. The court held the amendment application was not maintainable as it was unjustified and the plaintiff had ample opportunity to file such amendments earlier but failed to do so. The case is now set for defendant's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts