JITENDRA KUMAR DAS URF JITENDRA KURAIL vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 197/2025
Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30a. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail Excise
CNR: BRKT010083322025
Filing Number
7011/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
197/2025
Registration Date
15-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
6-Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
346
Police Station
BARARI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITENDRA KUMAR DAS URF JITENDRA KURAIL
Adv. Md. Jakrulla
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Exclusive Special Excise Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Jitendra Kumar Das, accused of illegally selling 40 liters of country-made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court found a prima facie case existed based on the FIR, evidence of seizure from a tin-hut behind the accused's house, his flight from police, and his status as a habitual offender with two prior similar convictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing
Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I
-
15-Jan-2026
Hearing
Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I
-
03-Jan-2026
Hearing
Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 197/2025
The Exclusive Special Excise Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Jitendra Kumar Das, accused of illegally selling 40 liters of country-made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court found a prima facie case existed based on the FIR, evidence of seizure from a tin-hut behind the accused's house, his flight from police, and his status as a habitual offender with two prior similar convictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts