DOLI DEVI vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 402/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),11592),117(2),109(1),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRKT010017512026

Filing Number

1516/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

402/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Katihar

Judge

10-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

FALKA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),11592),117(2),109(1),351(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DOLI DEVI

    Adv. Nitu kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Doli Devi in connection with FIR No. 31/2026 under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352, and 3(5), arising from a dispute over electrical wire connection for water pumping on 17.02.2026. The court found that while serious allegations existed, the injuries were not of the most grievous nature, and the dispute originated from a civil matter; accordingly, bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under CrPC section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 402/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Doli Devi in connection with FIR No. 31/2026 under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352, and 3(5), arising from a dispute over electrical wire connection for water pumping on 17.02.2026. The court found that while serious allegations existed, the injuries were not of the most grievous nature, and the dispute originated from a civil matter; accordingly, bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under CrPC section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case