CHANDAN MANDAL vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 298/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109(1),351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRKT010017502026
Filing Number
1515/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
298/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
10-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
FALKA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDAN MANDAL
Adv. NITU KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Order
Case Summary: Chandan Mandal v/s State of Bihar (298/2026) The court granted bail to Chandan Mandal, who was accused of assault arising from a dispute between neighbors over illegal electricity connections for water pumping on February 17, 2026. The accused was charged under IPC sections including 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found that both parties had reached a settlement and mutual compromise, and given the accused's clean criminal record and judicial custody since February 18, 2026, bail was deemed appropriate. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to compliance with Section 480(3) CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 298/2026
Case Summary: Chandan Mandal v/s State of Bihar (298/2026) The court granted bail to Chandan Mandal, who was accused of assault arising from a dispute between neighbors over illegal electricity connections for water pumping on February 17, 2026. The accused was charged under IPC sections including 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found that both parties had reached a settlement and mutual compromise, and given the accused's clean criminal record and judicial custody since February 18, 2026, bail was deemed appropriate. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to compliance with Section 480(3) CrPC provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts