MAHBOOB ALAM URF MAHBUR ALAM URF MAHBUL ALAM vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 300/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKT010017412026

Filing Number

1512/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

300/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Katihar

Judge

10-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

RAUTARA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

1.MAHBOOB ALAM URF MAHBUR ALAM URF MAHBUL ALAM

Adv. Shambhu prasad Mandal

Respondent(s)

1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
08-Apr-2026

OrderView PDF

Case Summary: 300/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Mahboob Alam, accused of tractor theft under IPC Sections 303(2) and 317(2), after considering that he was a local resident with no criminal history, had been in judicial custody since March 7, 2026, and was allegedly falsely implicated due to local politics. The court found the petitioner had legitimately purchased the tractor on September 10, 2017, for ₹6,50,000, weighing these factors against the prosecution's theft charge. Bail was granted on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount under BNSS 2023 Section 480(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
08-Apr-2026

Disposed

District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
06-Apr-2026

Hearing

District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
19-Mar-2026

Hearing

District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
18-Mar-2026

Hearing

District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
17-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
16-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 300/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 300/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Mahboob Alam, accused of tractor theft under IPC Sections 303(2) and 317(2), after considering that he was a local resident with no criminal history, had been in judicial custody since March 7, 2026, and was allegedly falsely implicated due to local politics. The court found the petitioner had legitimately purchased the tractor on September 10, 2017, for ₹6,50,000, weighing these factors against the prosecution's theft charge. Bail was granted on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties of equal amount under BNSS 2023 Section 480(3). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.