RAHUL KUMAR SAH vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 275/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,324,307,379. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKT010015972026

Filing Number

1384/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Katihar

Judge

20-District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

71

Police Station

KATIHAR

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,324,307,379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL KUMAR SAH

    Adv. Diwakar kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Rahul Kr. Sah, finding that injuries sustained by the informant were simple in nature rather than grievous, the allegation of theft appeared exaggerated, and the petitioner posed no flight risk despite being in judicial custody since February 2026. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Rahul Kr. Sah, finding that injuries sustained by the informant were simple in nature rather than grievous, the allegation of theft appeared exaggerated, and the petitioner posed no flight risk despite being in judicial custody since February 2026. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case