GUDDU YADAV vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 270/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(4)(5),318(4),336(3),336(3),338,340(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKT010015612026

Filing Number

1353/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

270/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Katihar

Judge

10-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

320

Police Station

KORHA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(4)(5),318(4),336(3),336(3),338,340(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUDDU YADAV

    Adv. PRATIK SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail petition of Guddu Yadav, accused of serious crimes including theft, robbery, and dacoity as part of the "Kodha Gang." The judge found that the accused has a criminal history across 19 cases in multiple states, and is an habitual offender with a dangerous criminal tendency, making him unsuitable for bail despite the defense arguments of his presumed innocence and lack of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 270/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail petition of Guddu Yadav, accused of serious crimes including theft, robbery, and dacoity as part of the "Kodha Gang." The judge found that the accused has a criminal history across 19 cases in multiple states, and is an habitual offender with a dangerous criminal tendency, making him unsuitable for bail despite the defense arguments of his presumed innocence and lack of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case