NITISH KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 263/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRKT010015452026
Filing Number
1339/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
263/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
10-District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
146
Police Station
DANDKHORA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NITISH KUMAR
Adv. RANJEETA KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar, granted bail to Nitish Kumar (age 18) and Rohit Kumar Jaiswal (age 20) in a theft case involving a stolen auto-rickshaw. The court found that while serious allegations exist, the accused had been in judicial custody since December 27, 2025, and considering their local ties, age, and lack of prior criminal history (except for one case against Rohit), bail was justified on specified conditions including furnishing sureties and executing bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 263/2026
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Katihar, granted bail to Nitish Kumar (age 18) and Rohit Kumar Jaiswal (age 20) in a theft case involving a stolen auto-rickshaw. The court found that while serious allegations exist, the accused had been in judicial custody since December 27, 2025, and considering their local ties, age, and lack of prior criminal history (except for one case against Rohit), bail was justified on specified conditions including furnishing sureties and executing bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts