TAUKIR ALAM vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 261/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109(1),118(1),117(1),74,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKT010015222026

Filing Number

1318/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

261/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Katihar

Judge

13-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

BALRAMPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109(1),118(1),117(1),74,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAUKIR ALAM

    Adv. Sikandar Yadav

  2. 2.MANOWAR ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Katihar granted bail to accused Taukir Alam and Manowar Alam, finding that injuries reported were largely simple in nature with only one grievous injury of 0.5 cm, and noting the existence of a counter-case suggesting a dispute between parties. The court ordered their release on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 261/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge-II, Katihar granted bail to accused Taukir Alam and Manowar Alam, finding that injuries reported were largely simple in nature with only one grievous injury of 0.5 cm, and noting the existence of a counter-case suggesting a dispute between parties. The court ordered their release on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case