RAHUL MANSURI vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 258/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRKT010015172026

Filing Number

1313/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

258/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Katihar

Judge

13-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

274

Police Station

BARARI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL MANSURI

    Adv. Mahanand yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to both accused Rahul Mansuri and Md. Nafique Alam in a dacoity case, finding that while a country-made pistol was recovered from their possession, no looted articles were recovered and they were not originally named in the FIR—being implicated only based on a co-accused's confessional statement. The petitioners were ordered released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 258/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to both accused Rahul Mansuri and Md. Nafique Alam in a dacoity case, finding that while a country-made pistol was recovered from their possession, no looted articles were recovered and they were not originally named in the FIR—being implicated only based on a co-accused's confessional statement. The petitioners were ordered released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case