MD. SAHAB vs State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah — 8/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 403(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
Criminal Miscllaneous
CNR: BRKT010015002026
Filing Number
1298/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Katihar
Judge
20-District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
ABADHPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. SAHAB
Adv. Deepak kumar Roy
-
2.MD. SALAM
-
3.MD. SAJABUL
-
4.MD. KALAM
-
5.MD. SOHAIL
-
6.MD. KATIHARU
-
7.BABLI KHATOON
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Jagdish Prasad sah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court modified its previous order dated 15.11.2025 and extended the deadline for seven petitioners to furnish their bail bond from four weeks to fifteen days from the date of this order (25.03.2026), recognizing that they were out of state for livelihood and unable to comply within the original stipulated period. The petition for extension of time to furnish bail bond was accordingly allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge Mp/Mla
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2026
The court modified its previous order dated 15.11.2025 and extended the deadline for seven petitioners to furnish their bail bond from four weeks to fifteen days from the date of this order (25.03.2026), recognizing that they were out of state for livelihood and unable to comply within the original stipulated period. The petition for extension of time to furnish bail bond was accordingly allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts